I would like to know more about how you are planning to use the
WHMS integration. One limitation our integration may have is we will
not be able to provide full rebranding when we do the integration with
WHMCS. The reports could have your logo, the product web client too
could have your logo, but the authentication screen / domain URL can
not be changed. We did have this previously though.
The reason for this limitation is the concerns raised by our
Security Team. To improve our overall online security and the privacy
and security of end users of our online service, we have to stick to
However the ease of purchase by your customers and all other user
experience we can take care of.
Thank you for your thoughtful reply, Gibu. It sounds like you do
understand what I'm trying to achieve. In response to your question
regarding the status of a Monitor Group when one check goes down, I
would think we'd want to mark it as "Trouble" rather than
"Down". This is the approach that most "inside"
monitoring systems take, so it would make sense to replicate it on the
"outside" as well.
Thanks for the quick feedback. We are in the process of getting a
Test Account but I wanted to see if that information could be
encrypted altogether. We don't really have to define permissions
but just encrypt the credentials information. Is that feasible?
Thanks for dropping in a Azure Cloud Service Monitoring feature request.
We have plans of implementing this monitoring feature in our near
Alternatively, if you would like to monitor metrics like CPU, memory and
disk usage and server availability you can use Site24x7 Server
Monitoring. Otherwise if you would like to monitor the performances of
.Net/Java applications running on these Azure servers you can use our
APM Insight monitoring.
Once we support Azure, we will enable out-of-the-box discovery for all
the applications and instances.
Please let us know the instances / applications / metrics you would like
to monitor. This will help us assist you better.
Please let us know once this feature is available as it is important for our buying decision. Also wanted to check if we coudl meanwhile iframe the graph page on our end and refresh it - Currently it is throwing an error for x frame access denied.
Possibility to chose if an exceded threshold should generate status
"Trouble" or "Down".
comments on what metric and Monitor would need this would help.
Basically to know how we decide if "Down" is based on a threshold.
Providing option to set different contact groups for Trouble Alert
and Down alert is a nice requirement.
would like to hear from a few more users before deciding on our plan
keep your feedback coming...
to only trigger alerts if threshold is broken for multiple
feature itself may not be there. However to make alerting
some of the metrics like Response Time URLs, CPU and Memory
Utilization for servers Trouble
status is generated only if the :
Current value is higher than Threshold Configured
Greater than the average of the 6 polled values (current value + 5
last polled values)
Atleast one other value in the last 5 polled values if higher than
the threshold configured
ps: I edited the subject of your post for clarity.
We agree there is no limit to how flexible the maintenance window
feature can get.
Thanks for reiterating the need for one additional schedule type.
We will wait for some more time and consolidate the use cases
requested and then decide on the implementation strategy.
method of multi select would also be useful so one could achieve
for example: 1st and 2nd Wednesday
and Thursdays of each month ?
too makes it easier to manage the whole maintenance configuration
process. But I guess this could make it harder to implement. We will
try to post screenshots on how the feature will look when we start
working on it.